Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Torres v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04258
Plaintiff:
Josue G Torres
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Keechant L. Sewell, Amy J Litwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilson v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv08939
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JAMES WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Wilson et al v. New York State et al
as 1:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
Leroy-James Wilson, Lawrence-Anthony Wilson, Keith-Craig Allen and others
Defendant:
New York State, Oath Court, Taxi and Limousine Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01685
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Batson et al v. RIM San Antonio Acquisition, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv07576
Plaintiff:
Barry Batson , David Douthat , William Langer Gokey and others
Defendant:
RIM San Antonio Acquisition, LLC , RIM Investment Group LLC , Bighorn Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Sze v. Pui-Ling Pang
as 1:2015cv00447
Plaintiff:
Kwok Sze
Defendant:
Pui-Ling Pang , Detective Corado , James Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos-Reyes v. The Asbestos Contractor, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07289
Plaintiff:
Daniel Miguel Ramos-Reyes
Defendant:
The Asbestos Contractor, Inc. and James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05743
Defendant:
Martin Banghart, Cornelius Buckley, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Bradt
as 1:2013cv06937
Petitioner:
James Wilson
Respondent:
Mark L. Bradt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
