Cases 21 - 30 of 105
Patton v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01186
Petitioner:
Kristopher Michael Patton
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jimenez v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01153
Petitioner:
Jesse Jay Jimenez
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv01152
Petitioner:
Rev. Patrick Hugh Ronald Morrison
Respondent:
Jamie Miller and Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Miller
as 2:2023cv01002
Petitioner:
Daniel Turner
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Miller
as 2:2023cv00854
Petitioner:
Kenneth Eric Hunt
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dale Brooks v. Jamie Miller, et al
as 23-35391
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAMIEN EUGENE BROOKS and DALE EUGENE BROOKS
Respondent / Appellee:
JAMIE MILLER, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Respondent:
STATE OF OREGON
Hunt et al v. Miller et al
as 2:2023cv00822
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Eric Hunt and Helen Alma Crawford
Defendant:
Jamie Miller, Oregon Department of Corrections, Snake River Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moret v. Bradford et al
as 2:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
Andrew Moret
Defendant:
Judy Bradford, Ashley Clements, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
