Cases 1 - 10 of 3,259
Plowman v. Baker et al
as 4:2024cv04080
Plaintiff:
Steven Plowman
Defendant:
Melissa Baker, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Bommiasami Veerasikku and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Village of Winnetka
as 1:2024cv03576
Plaintiff:
William Jackson, Kathleen Jackson, Chicago Title and Trust Company and others
Defendant:
Village of Winnetka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornille v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01202
Defendant:
Administrative Review Board, William Loy, Percy Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley J Cornille, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballance v. Illinois Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv03100
Plaintiff:
Kevas Ballance
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Correction, J.B. Pritzker, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lipscomb v. Carbondale Memorial Hospital et al
as 3:2024cv01159
Plaintiff:
Keon V. Lipscomb
Defendant:
Carbondale Memorial Hospital, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sistrunk v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Sistrunk
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Transit Authority, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler-Martin v. Snell et al
as 3:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Reginald Chandler-Martin
Defendant:
. Snell, L Adams, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delavega v. Cox et al
as 3:2024cv03087
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Delavega
Defendant:
Ashley Cox, Frank Catino, Kathy Ashcraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashford v. Jumper et al
as 4:2024cv04067
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ashford
Defendant:
Shawn Jumper and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
