Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Fourcade v. John Doe 1-8 et al
as 2:2021cv05607
Plaintiff:
Florencia Fourcade
Defendant:
John Doe 1-8, JANE DOE 1-3 and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALKER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
TREVOR WALKER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , ANDERSON , LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SINGLETON et al
as 2:2015cv01014
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JONES
Defendant:
RAYMOND SINGLETON, MICHAEL EDINGER, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAHILL et al v. BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2014cv00663
Plaintiff:
JOHN CAHILL
Defendant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , FREDERICK HERRAN , OFFICER JOHN DOE (1-4) and others
Movant:
BENSALEM TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Reitz et al
as 1:2012cv02045
Plaintiff:
Kenyatta Brooks
Defendant:
Earl Reitz, Shenk, John/Jane Doe 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Fed Ex et al
as 1:2012cv00767
Plaintiff:
Dorcas Holmes
Defendant:
Fed Ex, Jeffrey Benedict and John/Jane Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMALL v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2010cv06947
Plaintiff:
SYKEETA SMALL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and POLICE OFFICERS JANE DOE #1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WHITE v. ADAMS, et al
as 2:2009cv01267
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WHITE
Defendant:
JOYCE ADAMS, LEON A. KING, II, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WILKERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2007cv02172
Plaintiff:
DONTA WILKERSON
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-3, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
