Cases 41 - 50 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv11059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Khattri v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05953
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
PAWAN KHATTRI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rahaman v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv05897
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, ABC Agency 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Maksudur Rahaman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alam Niem v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv05433
Respondent:
United States of Bureau of Consular Affairs, Jane Does 1-10, US Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Nazmul Alam Niem
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hossain v. Cuccinelli et al
as 1:2020cv05395
Respondent:
Jane Does 1-10, Acting Director Ken Cuccinelli, William P. Barr and others
Plaintiff:
MD Anwar Hossain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Islam v. McAleenan et al
as 1:2020cv08860
Respondent:
JOHN DOES 1-10 (names and number of whom are unknown at present), Texas Service Center, Jane Does 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Foyzul Islam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 mn
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
