Cases 51 - 60 of 71
Lee v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2011cv00770
Plaintiff:
David Lee
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , GMAC Mortgage, LLC , Federal National Mortgage Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hamm v. Spalding County, Georgia et al
as 3:2010cv00192
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hamm
Defendant:
Spalding County, Georgia , James Dee Stewart , Robert Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. The City of Riverdale et al
as 1:2010cv04035
Plaintiff:
Dexter Webb
Defendant:
The City of Riverdale, The City of Riverdale Police Department, Daniel Vanhee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bake One, Inc. v. Mare et al
as 1:2010cv01046
Defendant:
Virginia (Ginny) L. Mare, Dawn Thomas, Greig L. Mare and others
Plaintiff:
Bake One, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv03011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01588
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01586
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
