Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04581
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv50036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2018cv05004
Defendant:
Jane Doe No. 22, Jane Does 1-10, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mollet v. Hospital Sisters Health System et al
as 1:2016cv09238
Defendant:
Hospital Sisters Health System , Hospital Sisters Services, Inc. , Stephen J Bochenek and others
Plaintiff:
Holly Mollet
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
International Services, Inc. v. Braiman et al
as 1:2016cv07055
Plaintiff:
International Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Robert Braiman, Cogent Analytics, LLC, f/k/a Braiman & Associates, LLC and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ebler et al v. Lee County et al
as 3:2016cv50167
Plaintiff:
John Ebler and Natalie Ebler
Defendant:
Lee County , City of Dixon and John and Jane Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03314
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Jackson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, a Division of Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kore Extreme LLC v. M-F Athletic Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv02493
Plaintiff:
Kore Extreme LLC
Defendant:
M-F Athletic Company, Inc., RFE International Ltd., Reebok International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
