Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00245
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Martinez v. Holder et al
as 4:2010cv00346
Petitioner:
Manuel Mayen Martinez
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Edward J. Eide and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Nnabuike v. Holder et al
as 4:2009cv02052
Plaintiff:
Kingsley Chidiebere Nnabuike
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01932
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Benjasattabuse v. Holder et al
as 4:2009cv01665
Plaintiff:
Wilawan Benjasattabuse
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Janet Napolitano, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Abdelhalim
as 4:2009cv01596
Plaintiff:
Yasser Abdelhalim
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano, Eric Holder, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv01279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
