Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Iran Thalassemia Society, et al v. Office of Foreign Assets Control, et al
as 23-35366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRAN THALASSEMIA SOCIETY, an NGO with over 23,000 thalassemia member patients, H.K., a five-year-old male Iranian child suffering from epidermolysis bullosa, A.M., a similarly afflicted seven year old female Iranian child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, JANET YELLEN, Secretary of the Treasury and ANDREA GACKI, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control
Iran Thalassemia Society, et al v. Office of Foreign Assets Control, et al
as 22-35850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRAN THALASSEMIA SOCIETY, an NGO with over 23,000 thalassemia member patients, H.K., a five-year-old male Iranian child suffering from epidermolysis bullosa, A.M., a similarly afflicted seven year old female Iranian child and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL, JANET YELLEN, Secretary of the Treasury and ANDREA GACKI, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control
Iran Thalassemia Society et al v. Office of Foreign Assets Control et al
as 3:2022cv01195
Plaintiff:
Iran Thalassemia Society, H.K., A.M. and others
Defendant:
Office of Foreign Assets Control, Janet Yellen and Andrea Gacki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McKenzie v. Small Business Administration et al
as 0:2022cv61125
Plaintiff:
Techaka McKenzie
Defendant:
Small Business Administration, Isabel Guzman, Janet Yellen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chen Bing v. Joseph Biden, Jr.
as 22-1424
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHEN BING and BING CHEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as the President of the United States, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his former official capacity as Secretary of State, ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his official capacity as Secretary of State and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
