Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Janos Farkas v. JP Morgan Chase Bnk, Natl Assn, et al
as 12-50747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANOS FARKAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and BRICE, VANDER, LINDEN & VERNICK, P.C.
Farkas v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A., et al
as 4:2012cv01475
Plaintiff:
Janos Farkas
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, NA , Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Yen Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Farkas v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association et al
as 1:2012cv00398
Defendant:
Brice, Vander Linden & Vernick, P.C. and JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association
Plaintiff:
Janos Farkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Farkas v. GMAC Mortgage LLC et al
as 4:2011cv03064
Defendant:
GMAC Mortgage LLC and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Plaintiff:
Janos Farkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Farkas v. Chase Home Finance LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00408
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance LLC, JPMorgan Chase National Association, Selim Taherzadeh and others
Plaintiff:
Janos Farkas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-10609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Baby Roberta Solis Bamert, et al v. Pulte Home Corporation, et al
as 10-10548
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BABY ROBERTA SOLIS BAMERT, JERRY CRAFT, JESSICA CRAFT and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PULTE HOME CORPORATION, a Michigan Corporation, THE WEAR GROUP, INC., JAMES E. WEAR and others
Bamert et al v. Pulte Home Corporation et al.
as 6:2008cv02120
Plaintiff:
Baby Roberta Solis Bamert, Baby Roberta Solis Bamert, Jerry Craft and others
Defendant:
Pulte Home Corporation, The Wear Group, Inc., James E. Wear and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
