Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Torres v. Jones
as 1:2014cv00020
Petitioner:
Antolin Torres
Respondent:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Madrid v. Jones
as 1:2014cv00003
Petitioner:
Luis Madrid
Respondent:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ortiz v. Jones
as 4:2013cv00545
Petitioner:
Guillermo Barreto Ortiz
Respondent:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Montgomery et al v. The Geo Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv01704
Defendant:
The Geo Group, Inc. , Jason Jones, Joe Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Tyosha N Montgomery , Mel Harrison , Debra Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jasso v. Jones
as 5:2013cv00017
Petitioner:
Carlos Ricardo Jasso
Respondent:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. Jones
as 5:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Carlos E Perez
Defendant:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv02590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rodriguez v. Jones
as 1:2012cv00143
Petitioner:
Conrado Acosta Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jason Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
The State of Texas v. Darque Tan LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00329
Third Party Plaintiff:
Darque Tan LLC, Robbie Segler and Segler Enterprises Ltd.
Defendant:
Darque Tan LLC, Jason Jones, Monica Jones and others
Third Party Defendant:
JK Capital, Inc., JK Products & Services, Inc. and NHSL, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Constitutional Rights
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Aces Austin, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2011cv01046
Defendant:
Aces Austin, L.L.C., Jason Jones and Brendan Puthoff
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Unauthorized Publication and Use of Communication
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
