Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03228
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jeff Butler and Brett Sissell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda and Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed (ID 72142) v. Geither et al
as 5:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
Noah D. Reed
Defendant:
Gloria Geither, Jeff Zmuda, Dan Schnurr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2022cv03170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthous and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox (ID 98253) v. Zmuda
as 5:2022cv03154
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cox
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Jeff Butler and Tommy Williams
Interested Party:
Kansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce (ID 58077) v. Butler
as 5:2022cv03012
Petitioner:
Christopher Pierce
Respondent:
Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams (ID 117388) v. Butler
as 5:2021cv03226
Petitioner:
Boe W. Adams
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Jeff Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Erwin (ID 123078) v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2021cv03213
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Erwin
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Libby Keogh, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davison (ID 104466) v. Butler et al
as 5:2021cv03145
Defendant:
(fnu) Thompson, Jarris Perkins and Jeff Butler
Plaintiff:
Charles Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
