Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Powers v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Clinton Lee Powers
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, S. Tollick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniels v. Dixon et al
as 3:2023cv01120
Plaintiff:
Michael J. McDaniels
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, Captain Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyree et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant:
C. A. Tyree, Gwava, T. McDarby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRANGE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00263
Plaintiff:
STEVE ALLEN STRANGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, J PAY CORPORATION, APRIL MCGREGOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. Dixon et al
as 3:2022cv00771
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Strange
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Jeffery McClellan, April McGregor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRANGE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
STEVE ALLEN STRANGE
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, J PAY CORPORATION, ETHAN KRIETMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Inch et al
as 3:2020cv00535
Defendant:
Mark Inch, E. Biascochea, Barry Reddish and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ignacio Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Palmer et al
as 3:2015cv00824
Plaintiff:
Enoch Donnell Hall
Defendant:
John Palmer, Jeffery McClellan, Gina Gay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demetrius Springs v. S. Brian Starling, et al
as 11-13654
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS LERONE SPRINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. BRIAN STARLING, STEVEN SINGER, RANDALL POLK and others
Demetrius Springs v. S. Starling, et al
as 11-12965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEMETRIUS LERONE SPRINGS
Defendant - Appellee:
S. BRIAN STARLING, STEVEN SINGER, RANDALL POLK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
