Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gumataotao v. Highsmith et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Gary Wayne Francis Gumataotao
Defendant:
David Jeffrey Highsmith, Government of Guam and Does I and II Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 1:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Evans Delva and others
Defendant:
S. Thomas Anderson, Joann Garcia Camacho, Melanie Mendiola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gumataotao v. Highsmith et al
as 1:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Mr. Gary Wayne Frances Gumataotao and Gary Wayne Frances Gumataotao
Defendant:
David Jeffrey Highsmith, Government Of Guam and Does I and II Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Aquiningoc et al
as 1:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Jeffrey Aquiningoc and Catherine Aquiningoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Paeste et al v. Government Of Guam
as 1:2011cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rea Mializa O. Paeste , Jeffrey F. Paeste and Sharon M. Zapanta
Defendant:
Government Of Guam
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1424
Teleguam Holdings, LLC v. Guam Public Utilities Commission et al
as 1:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
Teleguam Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Guam Public Utilities Commission and Jeffrey C. Johnson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Geronimo v. USA Gov't God/s et al
as 1:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
Joseph Geronimo, Jr., Jungle Democracy, Association of Need Based Demand of God and Divine Concepts and others
Defendant:
USA Gov't God/s, Democratic Devils, Human Gods, Judges of U.S. Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Siegel v. Coral Pit, Inc., a Guam Corporation
as 1:2007mc00009
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey R. Siegel
Defendant:
Coral Pit, Inc., a Guam Corporation
Movant:
Francis Gill
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
