Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Floyd v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 4:2017cv04045
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service LLC, Steve Dredge, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lamont v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04042
Plaintiff:
Spencer Samuel Lamont
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Eric Kunkel, Jennifer Blaesing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Aramark Correctional Services et al
as 1:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Sebron Floyd
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Steve Dredge, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MacKintosh v. Lockhardt et al
as 4:2016cv04264
Plaintiff:
Curtis J MacKintosh
Defendant:
Hughes Lockhardt and Jennifer Blaesing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemberger v. Dredge et al
as 4:2016cv04224
Defendant:
Steve Dredge, Jennifer Blaesing and Greg Scott
Plaintiff:
Michael Lemberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pegues et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2016cv04201
Plaintiff:
Walter Pegues and Joseph R Racanelli
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jennifer Blaesing, Joesph Hankins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Rauner et al
as 4:2016cv04089
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
Bruce Rauner, James T Dimas, James Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mackel v. Dimas et al
as 4:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
David Mackel
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregory M Bassi, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v Dimas et al
as 4:2015cv04097
Plaintiff:
Richard M Smego, Dothan Rogers, Jeffrey Alan Hargett and others
Defendant:
James Dimas, Gregg A. Scott, Michael Bednarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smego et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2015cv04057
Plaintiff:
Richard Michael Smego, Jeffrey Alan Hargett, Michael Hughes and others
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Jennifer Blaesing, Kevin Winters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
