Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Quadray Hobbs v. Wheeler Correctional Facility, et al
as 23-11243
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUADRAY HOBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
WHEELER CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, JENNIFER CLARK, Contract Monitor, S GIVENS, Kitchen Stewardess and others
MEHEUX v. OLIVER et al
as 7:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
DARIEN JOSEPH MEHEUX
Respondent:
TYRONE OLIVER and JENNIFER CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HOBBS v. WHEELER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 3:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
Quadray Hobbs
Defendant:
Wheeler Correctional Facility, Jennifer Clark, S GIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOBBS v. WHEELER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 5:2022cv00353
Plaintiff:
QUADRAY HOBBS
Defendant:
WHEELER CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JENNIFER CLARK, S GIVENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Williamson et al
as 3:2021cv00037
Defendant:
Mr. Horne, Cpt. Faison, Ms. Harold and others
Plaintiff:
Pierre Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILL v. Taste Rite, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv61445
Defendant:
Taste Rite, Inc. doing business as Taste Rite, Jennifer Clarke, LYNDEN GORDON and others
Plaintiff:
STACY A. HILL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01730
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WILLIAMS v. CURTIS et al
as 1:2018cv00229
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT JENNIFER CLARK and CHIEF CURTIS
Plaintiff:
MICAH WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cadle v. Tatum et al
as 6:2017cv00099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cadle
Defendant:
Clayton Tatum, Jennifer Clark and Andrew McFarlane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarborough v. Rogers State Prison et al
as 6:2017cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jerome William Yarborough
Defendant:
Rogers State Prison, Clay Tatum and Jennifer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
