Cases 1 - 10 of 14
James Washington v. Jennifer Black
as 23-3864
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES WASHINGTON
Respondent / Appellee:
JENNIFER GILLECE BLACK, Warden
Howard v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
as 1:2023cv01785
Plaintiff:
William Jack Howard, Sr.
Defendant:
Ohio Adult Parole Authority and Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse Gulley, Jr.In re: Jesse Gulley, Jr.
as 23-3176
Petitioner:
In re: JESSE JAMES GULLEY, JR.
Respondent:
JENNIFER GILLECE BLACK, Warden
Gulley v. Black
as 5:2022cv02217
Petitioner:
Jesse Gulley
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lenz v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01359
Plaintiff:
Jason Lenz
Defendant:
Anette Chambers-Smith, Michael Anderson and Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thoerig v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01272
Plaintiff:
Douglas Thoerig
Defendant:
Annette Chambers-Smith, Michael Andrson, Warden Jennifer Gillece-Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryan Raider v. Jennifer Black
as 22-3389
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN E. RAIDER
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY CLIPPER, Warden, Warden and JENNIFER GILLECE BLACK, Warden
Harvey v. Chambers-Smith et al
as 1:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
Norman Harvey and Norman F. Harvey
Defendant:
Jennifer Gillece Black, Annette Chambers-Smith, Mr. Gerren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yauger v. Black
as 5:2021cv02279
Petitioner:
Rickie Lee Yauger
Respondent:
Warden Jennifre Gillece Black and Warden Jennifer Gillece Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
