Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Crosby v. Buffalo Police Detective Nieman and Buffalo Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv00908
Defendant:
District Attorney Sedita and the County of Erie, Buffalo Police Detective Nieman and Buffalo Police Department, Joseph J. Terranova and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Bureru of Prisons
as 1:2020cv00452
Petitioner:
Jerome Crosby
Respondent:
Bureru of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crosby v. Parker et al
as 1:2019cv01443
Defendant:
Thomas M. Finnerty, Richard Gil Kerlikowske, Kevin Dillon and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC)Crosby v. Nunez et al
as 2:2019cv02131
Plaintiff:
Courtney Jerome Crosby
Defendant:
A. Aguilar and C. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Crosby v. Valencia et al
as 2:2018cv01848
Defendant:
Rachel Nava, R. Valencia, A. Aguilar and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Jerome Crosby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crosby v. Brown et al.
as 2:2017cv00277
Plaintiff:
Courtney Jerome Crosby
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, Scott Keenan, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CROSBY v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2014cv00419
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY JEROME CROSBY
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARROLL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv05840
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IRA CARROLL , DAMOS CARTER , CHARLES RAY CARTER, SR. and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00685
Plaintiff:
George Ira Carroll , Damos Carter , Charles Ray Carter, Sr. and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carroll et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as ILS/3:13-cv-00685
Plaintiff:
George Ira Carroll , Damos Carter , Charles Ray Carter, Sr. and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
