Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Watson v. Beyers et al
as 1:2023cv01633
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Beyers, Thomas Dart, Sgt. Szuls and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Unassigned
as 1:2019cv06985
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr. and Unassigned
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul and Illinois State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Chicago Police Dept. et al
as 1:2019cv05764
Defendant:
Ofc. Cooper and Chicago Police Dept.
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv02180
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County Jail and Sgt. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Cook County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff Department, Rizzo and Director Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv04154
Petitioner:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Cook County State's Attorney Office, Cook County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv02210
Plaintiff:
Jerome E Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois State Police, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. Illinois Attorney General Office et al
as 1:2014cv01993
Petitioner:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Respondent:
Illinois Attorney General Office, Cook County State's Attorney Office, Cook County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watson v. Illinois State Police et al
as 1:2014cv01592
Plaintiff:
Jerome E. Watson, Jr.
Defendant:
Illinois State Police, Illinois Attorney General Office, Illinois Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
