Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Rott v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 14-6152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN E. ROTT
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, JAY HARRINGTON and others
Cressman v. Thompson, et al
as 14-6020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CRESSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of Safety and Security and as the Commissioner of Public Safety for the State of Oklahoma, PAULA ALLEN, individually and in her official capacity as Licensing Services Hearing Officer for the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, THOMAS KEMP, JR., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commision and others
Cressman v. Thompson, et al
as 12-6151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH CRESSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL C. THOMPSON, in his official capacity as Secretary of Safety and Security and as the Commissioner of Public Safety for the State of Oklahoma, PAULA ALLEN, individually and in her official capacity as Licensing Services Hearing Officer for the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, THOMAS KEMP, JR., in his official capacity as Chairman of the Oklahoma Tax Commision and others
Muscogee (Creek) v. Henry, et al
as 11-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally-recognized Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General, Attorney General of Oklahoma, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and others
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Henry, et al
as 10-7026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION, a federally-recognized Tribe
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, Governor of Oklahoma, W.A. DREW EDMONDSON, Attorney General of Oklahoma, OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and others
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 09-5123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, THOMAS E. KEMP, JR., Chairman of the Tax Commission, JERRY JOHNSON, Warden, Vice-Chairman of the Tax Commission and others
Osage Nation v. Oklahoma Tax Commission, et al
as 09-5050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAGE NATION
Defendant - Appellee:
OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION, DON KIRKPATRICK, Secretary - Member of the Oklahoma Tax Commission, CONSTANCE IRBY, Secretary - Member of the Oklahoma Tax Commission and others
Amicus Curiae:
OKLAHOMA FARM BUREAU, OKLAHOMA CATTLEMEN'S ASSOCIATION, OSAGE COUNTY FARM BUREAU and others
Riches v. Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of, et al
as 08-6204
Plaintiff:
METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC., et al.,
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of Oklahoma, DREW EDMONDSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the state of Oklahoma, KEITH MCARTOR and others
Movant - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Chamber of Commerce of USA, et al v. Kemp, Jr., et al
as 08-6128
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OKLAHOMA STATE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY, GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS E. KEMP, JR., JERRY JOHNSON and CONSTANCE IRBY
Defendant:
BRAD HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of Oklahoma, DREW EDMONDSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the state of Oklahoma, KEITH MCARTOR and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, CHANGE TO WIN, ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY and others
Chamber of Commerce of USA, et al v. Edmondson, et al
as 08-6127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN TULSA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC., GREATER OKLAHOMA CITY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, OKLAHOMA RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK ASHTON, ANN CONG-TANG, DREW EDMONDSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the state of Oklahoma and others
Defendant:
BRAD HENRY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of Oklahoma, THOMAS E. KEMP, JR., JERRY JOHNSON and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, CHANGE TO WIN, ARIZONA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
