Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 10-1020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L WEINSHIENK, ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, LEWIS T. BABCOCK and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2010cv00067
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Robert Blackburn, Lewis T. Babcock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mueller v. Wilner et al
as 1:2009cv02152
Plaintiff:
Gilarime Michael Mueller
Defendant:
J. M. Wilner, Jerry Jones, Scott Vineyard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1198
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Matthews v. Wiley et al
as 1:2009cv00978
Plaintiff:
Norman Matthews
Defendant:
Ron Wiley, J. Fox, Jerry Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Akers v. Weinshienk, et al
as 09-1115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MONTGOMERY CARL AKERS
Defendant - Appellee:
ZITA L. WEINSHIENK, District Director, RON WILEY, ROBERT BAUER and others
Akers v. Weinshienk et al
as 1:2009cv00480
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
Zita L. Weinshienk, Ron Wiley, Robert Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. Egelhoff, et al
as 08-1405
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MARTIN F. EGELHOFF, ROBERT MCGAHEY, JOANN L. VOGT and others
Dawson v. Egelhoff et al
as 1:2008cv01976
Plaintiff:
James Ralph Dawson, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin (I) Egelhoff, Martin Egelhoff, Robert (I) McGahey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Akers v. Wiley et al
as 1:2008cv00637
Plaintiff:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant:
R. Wiley, Bauer, Lorentz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
