Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Cherelle German v. Jessie Streeter
as 14-60619
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHERELLE GERMAN
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN JESSIE STREETER
James Jones v. Jessie Streeter, et al
as 14-60370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CHRISTOPHER JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
JESSIE STREETER, WILLIE MAE WILLIAMS and BERNICE BROWN
Gregory Jones v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60899
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY DEON JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS and JESSIE STREETER
Columbus Carr, Jr. v. Jessie Streeter
as 13-60264
Petitioner - Appellant:
COLUMBUS CARR, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JESSIE STREETER
Tony Bunton v. Global Enterprise Organization, et al
as 13-60021
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY TERRELL BUNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
LEPHER JENKINS, Warden, Marshall County, in his individual and official capacity, WILLIE M WILLIAMS, in her individual capacity, GATSU BOSOMTWE, in his individual and official capacity and others
Ernest Collins v. GEO Group, Incorporated, et al
as 12-60906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERNEST E. COLLINS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEO GROUP, INCORPORATED, JAMES TUNSTAN, LIEUTENANT RYAN, Correctional Officer and others
Collins v. Geo Group Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Ernest E. Collins
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc., James Tunstan, Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rimmer v. Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
as 3:2011cv00161
Petitioner:
Charles Stacy Rimmer
Respondent:
Jessie Streeter and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Streeter et al
as 3:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
James Christopher Jones
Defendant:
Jessie Streeter, Willie Mae Williams, Bernice Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Pigeon et al
as 3:2011cv00140
Plaintiff:
Edwin L. Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
Peggy Pigeon, Jessie Streeter, Thomas Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
