Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Allen v. Schofield et al
as 3:2016cv02060
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen
Defendant:
f/n/u Schofield, Jewel Steele, State of Tennessee et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Page v. Steele et al
as 3:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Page
Defendant:
Jewel Steele, Bruce Westbrooks, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tabatha White v. Jewel Steele
as 14-5835
Petitioner - Appellee:
TABATHA WHITE
Respondent - Appellant:
JEWEL STEELE, Warden
Danny Meeks v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 14-5495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY RAY MEEKS
Defendant:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, TDOC Commissioner, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE CHRISTENSEN, FS/ADA Officer, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DENNIS DAVIS, Grievance Board Corporal and others
Danny Meeks v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 14-5293
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANNY RAY MEEKS
Defendant:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, TDOC Commissioner
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE CHRISTENSEN, FS/ADA Officer, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DENNIS DAVIS, Grievance Board Corporal and others
Chikita Bledsoe v. Derrick Scholfield, et al
as 14-5207
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHIKITA BLEDSOE
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK SCHOLFIELD, Commissioner; In his official and individual capacity, JIM DICKMAN, Assistant Commissioner; In his official and individual capacity, REUBEN HODGE, Assistant Commissioner; In his official and individual capacity and others
Fred Ratliff, Jr. v. Jewel Steele
as 13-6248
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED RATLIFF, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
JEWEL STEELE, Warden of the Lois M. Deberry Special Needs Facility
Letsinger v. Steele (TVV)
as 3:2013cv00484
Petitioner:
Glen C. Letsinger
Respondent:
Jewel Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Letsinger v. Steele
as 3:2013cv00766
Petitioner:
Glen C. Letsinger
Respondent:
Jewel Steele
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
