Cases 71 - 80 of 123
NezPerce v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
State of Montana, Brian M. Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Hollemon v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 22-35143
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARLES E. HOLLEMON
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN and AUSTIN KNUDSEN
Marsh v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2022cv00010
Petitioner:
Joseph Wayne Marsh
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Warner v. Godfrey et al
as 6:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Warner
Defendant:
Demetric Godfrey, Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Guyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClanahan v. Salmonsen
as 2:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Shane McClanahan
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00005
Petitioner:
David Wayne Nelson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fink v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00011
Petitioner:
Chris Steven Fink
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fails v. Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Petitioner:
John Daniel Fails
Respondent:
Board of Probation & Parole, Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans v Gootkin et al.
as 6:2021cv00093
Plaintiff:
Anthony Evans
Defendant:
Brian M. Gootkin and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ironman-Whitecow v. Salmonsen et al
as 4:2021cv00119
Petitioner:
Buggz Ironman-Whitecow
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
