Cases 31 - 40 of 122
Jones v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00049
Petitioner:
Brennan Adrian Jones
Respondent:
Lake County Montana, Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eisch v. Salmonsen
as 6:2023cv00028
Petitioner:
Brian L. Eisch
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Friedt v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2023cv00051
Petitioner:
Dennis Friedt
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Smith v. Montana Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Karl Smith
Defendant:
Montana Department of Corrections, Montana State Prison, Brian Gootkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolan v. Salmonsen
as 6:2023cv00018
Petitioner:
Donnie Nolan
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colwell v. Salmonsen
as 6:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
Sean Colwell
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NezPerce v. Reich et al
as 6:2023cv00013
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
Billie Reich, Jim Salmonsen, Cynthia Wolken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickerson v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2023cv00016
Petitioner:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Nelson v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 23-35031
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE NELSON
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN and AUSTIN KNUDSEN
Nickerson v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Billie Reich and Crystal Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
