Cases 61 - 70 of 122
Friedt v. Server et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Dennis Friedt
Defendant:
Collyn Server, Donna Mendenhall and Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taggart v. Salmonsen et al
as 1:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Lyle Perry Taggart
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Austin Knudsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donald Grant v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 22-35311
Petitioner / Appellant:
DONALD GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Apodaca v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Arthur S. Apodaca
Defendant:
Jim Salmonsen, Lynn Foster, Unit Manager Kambic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NezPerce v. Wolken et al
as 6:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
Cynthia Wolken, Jim Salmonsen and Jane/John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Douglas Pasquinzo v. State of Montana, et al
as 22-35260
Petitioner / Appellant:
DOUGLAS P. PASQUINZO
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF MONTANA and JIM SALMONSEN
Markus Kaarma v. Jim Salmonsen, et al
as 22-35256
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARKUS HENDRIK KAARMA
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, Montana State Prison, Deer Lodge and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Smaage v. Salmonsen et al
as 9:2022cv00059
Petitioner:
Shawn Kevin Smaage
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Salmonsen
as 9:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
George C. Wells
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NezPerce v. State of Montana et al
as 6:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Joseph Denny NezPerce
Defendant:
State of Montana, Brian M. Gootkin, Jim Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
