Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, et al
as 22-12072
Petitioner:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, BENEFITS REVIEW BOARD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Nolan Brantley
as 16-15320
Petitioner:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIRECTOR, OWCP and NOLAN BRANTLEY
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Secretary of Labor, et al
as 15-14885
Petitioner:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF LABOR and FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
James Walter Resources, Inc. v. Secretary, U.S. Department of, et al
as 15-11913
Petitioner:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
McClelland v. Jim Walter Resources Inc
as 7:2015cv00537
Plaintiff:
Brian McClelland
Defendant:
Jim Walter Resources Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv02161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jim Walter Resources, Inc. v. Director, OWCP, et al
as 13-13185
Petitioner:
JIM WALTER RESOURCES, INC.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIRECTOR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, DIRECTOR, OWCP and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
