Cases 1 - 10 of 13
James Biggins v. Matt Denn, et al
as 19-2095
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KLINE, ROBERT COUPE, LEANN DUNN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MARTIN, Paralegal II, DANA METZGER, Warden, STANLEY BAYNARD, Internal Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Biggins v. Minner et al
as 1:2017cv01739
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Matt Denn, Perry Phelps, Delaware Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kostyshyn v. Markell et al
as 1:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Peter Kostyshyn
Defendant:
Jack Markell, Bobby Coupe, Mike DeLoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00846
Plaintiff:
Carla Heath
Defendant:
Robert May, Wendi Caple, Thomas Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drummond v. May et al
as 1:2012cv00391
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Drummond
Defendant:
Robert May, Wendi Caple, Thomas Carrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilman v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00672
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Gilman
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps, Jim Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Danberg et al
as 1:2010cv00107
Plaintiff:
Ambria N. Smith
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Delaware Department of Corrections, Jim Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morrison v. Danberg et al
as 1:2009cv00800
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Morrison
Defendant:
Carl Danberg, Jim Welch and Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Wenzke v. Corr Med Ser, et al
as 09-2076
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADAM WENZKE
Defendant - Appellee:
CORR MED SER, FIRST CORR MED SVS, MAGGIE and others
Gilman v. Phelps et al
as 1:2008cv00629
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Gilman
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Jim Welch and Carl Danberg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
