Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Williams v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
Joseph E Williams
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bethea v. Barnhart
as 3:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Bethea
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Anthony v. Barnhart
as 3:2006cv00492
Plaintiff:
Deborah B. Anthony
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Holloman v. Barnhart
as 4:2007cv00048
Plaintiff:
Bertha B. Holloman
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rogers v. Barnhart
as 4:2007cv00026
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Plaintiff:
Michael R Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GREEN v. BARNHART
as 1:2007cv00095
Plaintiff:
BENNIE GREEN
Defendant:
JO ANNE B. BARNHART and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. Barnhart
as 3:2006cv00043
Plaintiff:
David T. Wilson
Defendant:
Jo Anne B. Barnhart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FRENCH v. BARNHART
as 1:2007cv00071
Plaintiff:
FRANCES FRENCH
Defendant:
JO ANNE B. BARNHART and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DUNKLEY v. BARNHART
as 1:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
REBECCA DUNKLEY
Defendant:
JO ANNE B. BARNHART and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
SMITH v. BARNHART
as 1:2007cv00038
Plaintiff:
ROBIN SMITH
Defendant:
JO ANNE B. BARNHART, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, ALBERTO R. GONZALES and others
Third-Party Defendant:
ALBERTO R. GONZALES and ANNA MILLS WAGONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
