Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Godfrey et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10627
Plaintiff:
Linda Godfrey and Joe Godfrey
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ERROR-NOT USED
as 3:2016cv02795
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC.
Defendant:
Maria Magdalena Melendez-Santa, Isabel Vazquez-Melendez, Joe Vazquez-Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Finance of America Reverse, LLC. v. Melendez-Santa et al
as 3:2016cv02796
Plaintiff:
Finance of America Reverse, LLC.
Defendant:
Maria Magdalena Melendez-Santa, Isabel Vazquez-Melendez, Joe Vazquez-Melendez and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
CitiMortgage Inc. v. Estate of Angel Rafael Roig Mejia et al
as 3:2016cv02545
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage Inc.
Defendant:
Estate of Angel Rafael Roig Mejia, Rafael Antonio Roig-Bigas, Rafael Juan Roig-Bigas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company v. Martinez-Sanjurjo et al
as 3:2016cv01304
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Cayman Asset Company
Defendant:
Nicky Joe Martinez-Sanjurjo and Aidelisa Vargas-Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodrigues v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 1:2015cv14254
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Rodrigues
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc. v. Cruz-Martinez et al
as 3:2015cv01446
Plaintiff:
Reverse Mortgage Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Gloria Esther Cruz-Martinez, Joe Doe, Conjugal Partnership Doe-Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Muckle v. US, et al
as 10-1652
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL L. MUCKLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK OBAMA and others
Muckle et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv10678
Plaintiff:
Paul L. Muckle
Defendant:
United States of America, George W. Bush, Barack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
