Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Ramirez v. Stephens
as 2:2015cv00437
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez v. Stephens
as 2:2014cv00474
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. JMR Ventures, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01245
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music Inc , MJ Publishing Trust , Sony/ATV Songs LLC and others
Defendant:
JMR Ventures Inc, JMR Enterprises Inc and Joe M Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Joe Ramirez v. Rissie Owens, et al
as 11-41088
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE ADAM RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
RISSIE OWENS and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ramirez v. Owens
as 2:2011cv00115
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramirez et al v. Owens
as 1:2010cv00663
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Chapa, James Dale Gandy, Lloyd O. McKinley and others
Defendant:
Rissie Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. USA
as 6:2009cv00097
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Joe Arzola Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ramirez v. McQueen et al
as 4:2009cv02690
Plaintiff:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Defendant:
Leticia G McQueen and Sigifredo Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe Ramirez v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-40372
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOE ADAM RAMIREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION and RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ramirez v. Quarterman
as 2:2008cv00144
Petitioner:
Joe Adam Ramirez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
