Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Danna Vongamath v. Tommy Chen Bui
as 5:2023cv00352
Plaintiff:
Danna Vongamath
Defendant:
Tommy Chen Bui, Gavin Newsom, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv08709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Barnes v. Harris et al
as 2:2022cv02175
Petitioner:
Antoine DeShawn Barnes
Respondent:
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gregory Scott Van Huisen v. Charles Brown et al
as 2:2022cv08426
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Van Huisen
Defendant:
Charles Brown, Bill J. Burns, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salvador Estrada Montero v. Joe Biden et al
as 2:2022cv01396
Plaintiff:
Salvador Estrada Montero
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Attorney General Merrick B. Garland, D.A. Jessica Cleace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ruschhaupt v. Trump
as 4:2021cv08892
Plaintiff:
Christopher Todd Ruschhaupt
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Dianne Feinstein, Bill Gates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Deshawn Barnes v. T.V. Nationwide Network et al
as 2:2021cv08336
Plaintiff:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Defendant:
T.V. Nationwide Network, President Joe Biden, Governor Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Yocom v. Biden et al
as 4:2021cv05228
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Yocom
Defendant:
Joe Biden and Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Yocom v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv01015
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Yocom
Defendant:
Kamala Harris and Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
