Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Green v. Director of TDCJID et al
as 1:2018cv00925
Petitioner:
Markus A. Green
Respondent:
Director of TDCJID, Sgt. Vong Praethoum and Joe Milbern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv00143
Defendant:
Barbara Sapp, Unnamed Ombudsman, Charles Horsely and others
Plaintiff:
Earl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Davis et al
as 2:2018cv00144
Defendant:
Charles Horsely, Lorie Davis, NFN Ramirez and others
Plaintiff:
Earl King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chavez v. Jackson et al
as 2:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Raul Chavez
Defendant:
Shadrick Jackson, Mathey Seymour, Joe Milbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyrian Strong v. Jamie Baker, et al
as 17-10612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DYRIAN K. STRONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE L. BAKER, Warden, JOE MILBERN, Assistant Warden, SUSAN DOCKERY, Administrator and others
Jose Olive v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-10580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, KIETH GENTRY, JOE MILBERN and others
Jose Olive v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-11235
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL OLIVE
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, KIETH GENTRY, JOE MILBERN and others
Olive v. Stephens et al
as 2:2016cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jose Manuel Olive
Defendant:
Wm. Stephens, Kieth Gentry, Joe Milbern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph Fowler v. Whitfield, et al
as 16-10465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BERNARD FOWLER, also known as Eugene Bernard Fowler, also known as Joe Fowler, also known as Eugene Fowler
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. WHITFIELD, OLIVER BELL, Chairman of Texas Board of Corrections, JAMIE BAKER, Warden and others
Strong v. Baker et al
as 2:2015cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dyrian K. Strong
Defendant:
Jamie L Baker, Joe Milbern, Susan Dockery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
