Cases 1 - 6 of 6
SMITH et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv04186
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
JOE SMITH and THE ESTATE OF CAROLYN HARRIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2019cv16254
Defendant:
MERCK & CO. INC. D/B/A MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
STEVIE JOE SMITH
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH et al v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv01786
Defendant:
TAKEDA DEVELOPMENT CENTER AMERICAS INC. F/K/A TAKEDA GLOBAL RESEARCH &DEVELOPMENT CENTER, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Plaintiff:
JOE SMITH and SUSAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
as 2:2017md02789
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Plaintiff:
KAREN C. KING, DEE A. MANKINS, DEBRA BRAMBLETT and others
Defendant:
TAKEDA GMBH, SANTARUS INC., BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALBARQAWI et al v. NEW YORK BAGEL ENTERPRISES, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv00415
Plaintiff:
RIMA ALBARQAWI , BASSAM M. BARQAWI and BASIL M. ALBARQAWI
Defendant:
NEW YORK BAGEL ENTERPRISES, INC. and JOE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SMITH et al v. THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2009cv04268
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY SMITH and JOE SMITH
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE, STATE TROOPER RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
