Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Carter v. Washington et al
as 2:2021cv11361
Defendant:
Jeffrey Stieve, Rosilyn Jindal, Rickey Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Carter
Carter v. McKee et al
as 2:2019cv10391
Defendant:
B. Evers, Lee McRoberts, Paul Klee and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Carter
Joel Carter v. Jamie Ayala, et al
as 17-1506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMIE AYALA, Psychiatrist and ROBERT DAVIS, Psychiatrist
Joel Carter v. Daniel Heyns, et al
as 17-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL H. HEYNS, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, DAVID DAWDY, Director of Corrections Mental Health Program, BILL VETTE, Mental Health Rights Specialist of Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Joel Carter v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Daniel Heyns, Director, KATHLEEN A. MUTSCHLER, Director, Corrections Mental Health Program, RICK RAYMOND, Western Regional Director, Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PSYCHOLOGIST CARRIE MCROBERTS, SURJIT DINSA and JENNIFER PIRLOT, Mental Health Unit Chief
Joel Carter v. Andrew Hickok, et al
as 16-2423
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTION OFFICER ANDREW HICKOK, SERGEANT MARK BRAND and LIEUTENTANT MATTHEW BENNICKSON
Joel Carter v. Randall Haa
as 15-2035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
R. HAAS
Joel Carter v. MDOC, et al
as 13-2519
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARESH B. PANDYA, Regional Medical Officer and JEFFREY STIEVE, Doctor
Joel Carter v. Ricumstrict, et al
as 13-1516
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL KRAJNIK, Resident Unit Manager, DALE HUGHES, aka R Huges, SMITH, Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
