Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter, John O'Connor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Traylor Rains, Office of the Attorney General, Nicole M Nantois and others
Plaintiff:
Janice Cassandra Wrenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wrenn v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Traylor Rains, Nicole M Nantois, Lisa Gifford and others
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Oklahoma Health Care Authority et al
as 5:2018cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kelly K Taylor
Defendant:
Oklahoma Health Care Authority and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Oklahoma Health Care Authority et al
as 5:2016cv01180
Plaintiff:
Kelly K Taylor
Defendant:
Oklahoma Health Care Authority and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pecha v. Lake, et al
as 16-6143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALFRED PECHA, by and through Patty Pecha-Weber, Next Friend and attorney-in-fact,
Defendant - Appellee:
ED LAKE, Director of Oklahoma Department of Human Services and JOEL NICO GOMEZ, Director of Oklahoma Health Care Authority
Waters v. Lake et al
as 5:2015cv00376
Plaintiff:
George Robert Waters
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shackelford v. Lake et al
as 5:2015cv00218
Plaintiff:
Leola Shackelford
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathcart v. Lake et al
as 5:2014cv01382
Plaintiff:
Carol Cathcart
Defendant:
Ed Lake and Joel Nico Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
