Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Gonzalez v. Department of Agriculture
as 24-1672
Petitioner:
JOEY D. GONZALEZ
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Gonzalez v. Department of Agriculture
as 23-1647
Petitioner:
JOEY D. GONZALEZ
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Joey Gonzalez Ramos v. ADR Vantage, Inc., et al
as 22-7045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joey D. Gonzalez Ramos
Defendant / Appellee:
ADR Vantage, Inc., Walker, Murphy & Nelson, LLP and John J. Murphy, III
Gonzalez v. U.S. Department of Agriculture
as 1:2022cv20312
Plaintiff:
Joey D Gonzalez Ramos
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Unknown Employees of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and The Department of Justice and Vanessa Eisemann
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Gonzalez v. Department of Agriculture
as 1:2022cv20190
Plaintiff:
Joey D Gonzalez
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002 Fair Labor Standards Act
Joey Gonzalez Ramos v. ADR Vantage, Inc.
as 21-7124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joey D. Gonzalez Ramos
Defendant / Appellee:
ADR Vantage, Inc.
Intervenor / Appellee:
United States Department of Agriculture
GONZALEZ RAMOS v. ADR VANTAGE, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00592
Plaintiff:
JOEY D. GONZALEZ RAMOS
Defendant:
JOHN J. MURPHY, III, WALKER, MURPHY & NELSON, LLP and ADR VANTAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2021cv20002
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Joey D Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Gonzalez v. Justice et al
as 1:2021cv20001
Defendant:
usda and The Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Joey D Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Gonzalez v. Ramsey et al
as 1:2020cv25019
Defendant:
United States Attorney and Clifford Ramsey
Plaintiff:
Joey D. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
