Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Tota v. New York State Department of Motor Vehicles et al
as 1:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
Anthony Samuel Tota
Defendant:
New York State Department of Motor Vehicles, Mark J.F. Schroeder, Erick Johanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc. v. Payne et al
as 1:2019cv11297
Nominal Defendant:
Deborah A. Smith, DST Systems, Inc., Myrl C. Jeffcoat and others
Plaintiff:
Ruane Cuniff & Goldfarb, Inc. and Ruane Cunniff & Goldfarb, Inc.
Defendant:
Percy Payne, Brenda Keeton, Kathleen Moerschel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109
Agron et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11841
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gonzalez, Peter Volpe, James Padula and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Smith v. NSA et al
as 1:2016cv09916
Plaintiff:
Regina Marie Smith
Defendant:
NSA, Gloria Wood, Mitch Strong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv05552
Defendant:
Police Officer Kevin Deleon, John Doe #1-6, Police Officer Medina and others
Plaintiff:
Johanson Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johanson v. County of Erie et al
as 1:2011cv00228
Plaintiff:
Faye Johanson
Defendant:
County of Erie, New York and Erie County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Truckin' Construction Corp. et al
as 2:2011cv00915
Defendant:
Carlo Lizza & Sons Paving, Inc., David Johanson, Elia Aly Lizza and others
Counter Claimant:
David Johanson, David Johanson, David Johanson and others
Counter Defendant:
Michael Murray, Michael Murray and Michael Murray
Plaintiff:
Michael Murray and Peter A. Quintana, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
