Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Montpelier v. Doe
as 3:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Dale J Montpelier and Dale J Montpelier, Sr.
Defendant:
John & Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunningham v. Mitchell et al
as 3:2017cv00392
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Eastern Legal Services, Paul Hank, Karl Kepper and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cunningham v. Jacovetti et al
as 3:2016cv02922
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Robert Jacovetti , Law Office of Robert Jacovetti, P.C. , Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Sunshine Consulting Group, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02921
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Sunshine Consulting Group, LLC , Sunshine Consultation Services, LLC , Donna Cologna and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF et al
as 3:2016cv02629
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Rapid Capital Funding, LLC/RCF , Craig Hecker , GRS Telecom, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Seven90, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv02500
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Seven90, LLC, Joshua Askeroth, Eli Conner and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Pratt et al
as 3:2016cv02468
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Steven Pratt, Pelvic Thrust Media, LLC, Anvil Advertising, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Zoccali et al
as 3:2016cv02299
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Joey Zoccali, Global Media and Rewards, LLC, Professional Education Properties, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Cunningham v. Local Lighthouse Corp et al
as 3:2016cv02284
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Local Lighthouse Corp, Richard Paik, Eric Oakley and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
