Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Enriquez v. Does
as 2:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Little Joe Enriquez
Defendant:
John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lankford v. Simpson et al
as 6:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dewayne Lankford
Defendant:
Jenny M Simpson, JANE DOE, FNU Koch and others
Amicus Curiae:
Office of the Attorney General as Amicus Curiae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
as 4:2022cv02659
Plaintiff:
R Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
Lee H Rosenthal, District Judge Keith P Ellison, US District Judge Lynn N Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Collier et al
as 1:2021cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jerald Anthony Hall
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Aaron J Tompkins, Kevin L Benjamin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock v. Ofc Wagner et al
as 4:2021cv00725
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Hancock
Defendant:
Ofc Wagner, Lt Harris, Classification Director John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Richardson et al
as 2:2020cv00297
Defendant:
Law Library Indigent Supplies Personnel John/Jane Doe's, F Keesee, J Tovar and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson, et al v. Lange, et al
as 6:2020cv01155
Plaintiff:
Michael Orville Anderson, III and Michael Orville Anderson, II
Defendant:
Sheriff Eddie Lange, Chiefs of Police, Sheriffs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irving v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2020cv03020
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe, R. Perez and Ed Gonzalez
Plaintiff:
Jaleel Irving
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman v. John/Jane Doe
as 4:2020cv02472
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Terell W. Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Epley v. Luong D.D.S. et al
as 3:2020cv00043
Defendant:
Tawana Lakesha Smith, MD, Wanda T. Hilliard, APRN, Julia Renee Ward, MD and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Epley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
