Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Shannon Riley v. Sheriff Luna et al
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Shannon Riley
Defendant:
Sheriff Luna, John Jane Doe Deputy Sheriff and John Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nashuan Grace v. David Samuels et al
as 2:2022cv04345
Plaintiff:
Nashuan Grace
Defendant:
Warden David Samuels, David Samuels, Associate Warden John Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Jackson v. John McMahon et al
as 5:2019cv00548
Defendant:
John-Jane Doe, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael R. Spengler v. LASD Mental Health et al
as 2:2017cv03059
Defendant:
John Jane Does-Mental Health Dept. TTCF, LASD Mental Health, Sheriff Deputy Moses and others
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Michael R. Spengler v. Ms. Hundly et al
as 2:2017cv03078
Defendant:
David Gunner, Ms. Hundly and John Jane Doe Sheriffs
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler
Niyatii Winters v. Dr. Saweris et al
as 5:2017cv00538
Defendant:
Deputy Sheriff Barrios, Jane Doe, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Niyatii Winters
Michael R. Spengler v. LASD et al
as 2:2016cv06880
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Spengler and Michael Spengler
Defendant:
LASD, Carreon, LASD Bureau of Labor Relations and Compliance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Spengler v. Los Angeles County Jail Medical et al
as 2:2016cv06509
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Jail Medical, Tower 2 TTCF Medical Clinic, Maurice R Jolliff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Spengler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Alexander Graves-Bey v. Arcadia Police Department et al
as 2:2015cv08558
Defendant:
Arcadia Police Department, City of Arcadia, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Alexander Graves-Bey
Sergio Jacobo Ramos v. The State of California et al
as 2:2015cv05511
Respondent:
Warden John Jane Doe and The State of California
Petitioner:
Sergio Jacobo Ramos
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
