Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Peller v. Anderson et al
as 1:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
Melvin Peller
Defendant:
Anthony K. Anderson, Ann C. Berzin, Laurie Brlas and others
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv02712
Plaintiff:
City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan
Defendant:
John F. Young, Anthony K. Anderson, Linda Jojo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nicosia v. Young et al
as 1:2023cv02605
Plaintiff:
Donna M. Nicosia
Defendant:
John F. Young, Anthony K. Anderson, Linda Jojo and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Exelon Corporation Derivative Litigation
as 1:2021cv03611
Plaintiff:
James Clem, Benjamin Jason Wax, Michael Dybas and others
Defendant:
Exelon Corporation, Christopher M. Crane, Joseph Dominguez and others
Petitioner:
Donna M. Nicosia, City of Coral Springs Police Officers' Pension Plan and John Hooker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
John E. Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv02760
Plaintiff:
John Edward Rogers and John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Koretsky et al v. Seyfarth Shaw, LLP et al
as 1:2016cv00571
Plaintiff:
Michael Koretsky, Frank Koretsky, International Video Distributors, LLC and others
Defendant:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP , John E. Rogers , Jetstream Business Limited and others
Mediator:
Howard A. Tescher, David H. Lichter and Brian F. Spector
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
John Rogers, et al v. CIR
as 15-3678
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN EDWARD ROGERS and FRANCES L. ROGERS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Rogers v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv04989
Plaintiff:
John E. Rogers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
