Cases 1 - 10 of 10
O'CONNOR v. S.O.M.E. et al
as 1:2020cv02298
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, CHARLES ALLEN, VINCENT C. GRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR V. ADAMS et al
as 1:2020cv00721
Plaintiff:
O'CONNOR and CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Defendant:
ADAMS, PATRICIA HANDY PLACE FOR WOMEN, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'CONNOR v. S.O.M.E. et al
as 1:2020cv00547
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, JOHN DOES 1-10, LAW FIRM OF OFFIT KUMAN AND TODD KELTING and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
O'CONNOR v. SOME et al
as 1:2020cv00480
Defendant:
SOME, JOHN ADAMS, SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN E. O'CONNOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
TURNBULL et al v. COLVIN et al
as 1:2016cv01750
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TURNBULL , JANET TURNBULL , ALISON BARNES and others
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
UNITED PILOTS FOR JUSTICE, INC. et al v. UNITED AIRLINES CORPORATION et al
as 1:2010cv02324
Plaintiff:
UNITED PILOTS FOR JUSTICE, INC. , MIKE KELLY , STEVE CHILES and others
Defendant:
UNITED AIRLINES CORPORATION, UNITED LOYALTY SERVICES, LLC, GLENN F. TILTON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
ROBINSON v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00709
Petitioner:
MICHAEL C. ROBINSON
Respondent:
JOHN ADAMS, PAUL SLOAN and JAMIE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
TISDALE v. THALER et al
as 1:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
LANCE WILLIAM TISDALE
Defendant:
RICK THALER and JOHN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CRAYTON v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
LEE D. CRAYTON
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, PAUL SLOAN and JAMIE BAKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HOOD v. ADAMS et al
as 1:2009cv02001
Plaintiff:
ARON DERAL HOOD
Defendant:
JOHN ADAMS, PAUL SLOAN and JAIME BAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
