Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Matthew Tassone, et al v. Elizabeth Gill, et al
as 19-3626
Defendant / Appellee:
ZEPHYNIA TASSONE, JUDGE ELIZABETH GILL, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, MAGISTRATE DAVID BLACK, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TASSONE
Plaintiff:
L.T., Minor Child
Tassone et al. v. Judge Elizabeth Gill et al.
as 2:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Zephynia Tassone, Judge Elizabeth Gill, John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and others
Plaintiff:
L.T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ruiz-Bueno, III, et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc, et al
as 15-3797
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN C. RUIZ-BUENO, III, Administrator of the Estate of Edward Peterson and MICHAEL ANTHONY GAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAXIM HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC., MARIA SYLVESTRI, MARY COMPTON and others
Defendant:
JANE DOES, 1-10
Ruiz-Bueno, III et al v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02548
Plaintiff:
John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and Michael Gay
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc., Maria Sylvestri, Mary Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Ruiz-Bueno, III, et al v. Zack Scott, et al
as 14-4149
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOHN C. RUIZ-BUENO, III and MICHAEL ANTHONY GAY
Defendant:
ZACK SCOTT, Franklin County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities
Defendant - Appellant:
SETH NIBERT and RANDALL HOAR, in their individual and official capacities
John Ruiz-Bueno, III, et al v. Zack Scott, et al
as 14-4151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN C. RUIZ-BUENO, III and MICHAEL ANTHONY GAY
Defendant - Appellee:
ZACK SCOTT, Franklin County Sheriff, in his individual and official capacities, et al
Ruiz-Bueno, III et al v. Scott et al
as 2:2012cv00809
Plaintiff:
John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and Michael Anthony Gay
Defendant:
Zack Scott, Franklin County Corrections Center II, Doug Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
