Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Oak 44 Property Management, LLC v. Maddix et al
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Oak 44 Property Management, LLC and John D Gaston
Respondent:
Justin Maddix, Stephen Wood, Lexington 859 Service, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Harrison v. Smith et al
as 0:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
James Harrison
Defendant:
Fairrel D. Smith, John D. Vaught, Zachary R. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
England v. Simcoe
as 3:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Travis Dean England
Defendant:
Judge John D. Simcoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Helton v. USA
as 6:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
John D. Helton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 0:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker, Anthony Baker, Ashley Heath Baker and others
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Minton et al
as 3:2022cv00643
Plaintiff:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Defendant:
John D. Minton, Jr., Unknown KY. Sup. Ct. Justices, Erin Hoffman-Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Shumate et al
as 3:2022cv00452
Plaintiff:
Chad-Alan: Heath
Defendant:
Kimberly W. Shumate and John D. Simcoe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Baker v. Chandler et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Larry D. Chandler, Cookie Crews, Rhonda May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pfeufer v. Capital One N.A. Corporation
as 5:2022cv00002
Defendant:
Capital One N.A. Corporation and Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff:
John D. Pfeufer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 la
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
