Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Malone v. Washington, State of et al
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Malone
Defendant:
Washington, State of, Kenneth Clark, John D. Snaza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Firehole River Capital v. Supurva Healthcare Group et al
as 2:2021cv00153
Defendant:
John D. Murphy, Jr. and Supurva Healthcare Group
Plaintiff:
Firehole River Capital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tondro v. Innovative Yacht Builders et al
as 4:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Innovative Yacht Builders, David Taylor, Adonia Racing and others
Plaintiff:
John D. Tondro
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Fucci et al v. Bowser et al
as 2:2020cv00004
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Samson, Maxon-Multiline, EC9 Holdings and others
Defendant:
J&J Cubit Construction, Christopher J. Ashby, Kate Jensen and others
Chon v. USA et al
as 2:2016cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tae H. Chon
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, George W. Bush, John D. Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richmond American Homes of Utah v. Auto Owners Insurance et al
as 2:2015cv00457
Plaintiff:
Richmond American Homes of Utah
Defendant:
Auto Owners Insurance and John D. Marchant Construction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates v. Black et al
as 2:2014mc00880
Plaintiff:
Robb Evans of Robb Evans & Associates
Defendant:
Arvin Lee Black, II, Sole Group, Atia Black and others
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Inland Western Salt Lake City Gateway v. Bowen
as 2:2014cv00557
Plaintiff:
Inland Western Salt Lake City Gateway
Defendant:
John D. Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bevan v. State of Utah
as 2:2013cv00624
Petitioner:
John D. Bevan
Respondent:
State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finucan et al v. Hadco Construction et al
as 2:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Kevin Finucan and Ruben Martinez
Defendant:
Hadco Construction and John D. Hadfield
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
