Cases 1 - 10 of 13
DECKER et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 4:2022cv00422
Plaintiff:
JOHN DECKER and ASHANN RA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and BETH E CABELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DECKER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19183
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JOHN DECKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DECKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23717
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DECKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nagel v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv00201
Defendant:
Bill LNU, Charles Tynon, Jose Doorman and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Hilton et al
as 1:2019cv00123
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. 425 Park South Tower Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv00112
Defendant:
Jose "Perez", Legal/Compliance Manager Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Warren et al
as 1:2019cv00113
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Linda Ford, Company of Bruce Fyfe and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nagel v. Janvier et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Charles Tynon, Lexolution Client Associate, Manpower Attorney 13 and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Nagel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benn v. Miami-Dade County et al
as 1:2019cv20198
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County, Ivan Nacil, State of Florida and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Benn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Erdmann v. Hanson et al
as 0:2013cv02982
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Erdmann
Defendant:
Jeff Hanson, Thor Howe, Jason Haider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
