Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Kesha Green v. Iron Workers Local 11, et al
as 24-1485
Plaintiff:
KESHA MICHELLE GREEN
Defendant:
IRON WORKERS LOCAL 11, JOHN DOES 1-10, (SAID NAMES BEING FICTITIOUS, REAL NAMES UNKNOWN) and ABC ENTITIES 1-10, (said names being fictitious, real names unknown)
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID E. CASSIDY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2423
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Saintil v. Borough of Carteret, et al
as 22-2898
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD SAINTIL
Defendant / Appellee:
BOROUGH OF CARTERET, CARTERET POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWNSHIP OF HAMILTON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2245
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ted McCracken v. Jacqueline McCracken Blei, et al
as 22-1289
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TED AARON MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
JACQUELINE MCCRACKEN BLEI, SUED IN HER OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, JOSEPH BLEI, SUED IN HIS OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, PATRICK MOLLOY, CHIEF ABINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT SUED IN HIS OFFICIALAND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITIES, a/k/a JOHN DOE 1 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1160
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
