Cases 1 - 10 of 120
Butler v. Doe I et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Ricky Butler
Defendant:
John Doe I, John Doe II and FNU Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harpo-Brown v. FNU et al
as 5:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Wihly Harpo-Brown
Defendant:
Gunther FNU, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv14001
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Howard Wesley
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and Officer A. Grisheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01194
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Howard Wesley
Defendant:
John Doe, I, John Doe, II and A. Grisheimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpkins v. Wissinger et al
as 5:2023cv00630
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Simpkins, Leo, Man and others
Defendant:
FNU Wissinger, John Doe, I, John Doe, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Gorbey v. Brian Davis, et al
as 23-12959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN J. DAVIS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE, I and others
Joshua Money v. Warden of Johnson State Prison, et al
as 23-12940
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ISAIAH MONEY
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN OF JOHNSON STATE PRISON, WARDEN OF GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC AND CLASSIFICATION STATE PRISON, VILLEGAS and others
John Doe, 1, et al v. USA
as 23-12822
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN DOE, I, JANE DOE, I, JOHN DOE, II and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
LEE v. DIVA NAILS et al
as 5:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
ISAAC ALFONSO LEE
Defendant:
DIVA NAILS, JOHN DOE, I, JOHN DOE, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
