Cases 1 - 10 of 46
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FENNELL v. JOHN DOE #1 et al
as 2:2022cv04545
Plaintiff:
JAMARCUS FENNELL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, OFFICER JOHN DOE #2, JOHN DOE #3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PERCELL v. NGO et al
as 1:2021cv19520
Plaintiff:
RASHEEN PERCELL
Defendant:
THANG NGO, ALEXANDER WIZBICKI, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABDULLAH v. DOE #1 et al
as 3:2021cv08429
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #2 and JOHN DOE #1
Plaintiff:
ASMAR ABDULLAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COY v. GUY et al
as 3:2020cv15947
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM COY
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 7, MONMOUTH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE NARCOTICS STRIKE TASK FORCE, DANIEL MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRECO v. GREWAL et al
as 3:2019cv19145
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 2-10, CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, JARED M. MAPLES and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID M. GRECO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GHAHARY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv19119
Defendant:
FEDERAL TRANSFER CENTER, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, US MARSHALLS SERVICE US MARSHALLS SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
DARIUS A GHAHARY and DARIUS F GHAHARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WIERZBICKI v. CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2019cv17721
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1, John Does 2, CITY OF JERSEY CITY and others
Plaintiff:
Miroslaw Wierzbicki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16364
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GOMEZ v. RODRIGUEZ et al
as 2:2019cv12419
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 2-5, JOHN DOE 1, P.O. R. RODRIGUEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MAXIMO GOMEZ, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
